Search for: "Brown v Doe" Results 2741 - 2760 of 5,962
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  It may well be that the Third Defendant’s “notice and take down” procedure has not operated as rapidly as Mr Browne and his client would wish, but it does not follow as a matter of law that between notification and “take down” the Third Defendant becomes or remains liable as a publisher of the offending material. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:56 am by John Jascob
” Honigberg replied that, due to Copley’s unique structure and operating history, the “apples to apples” comparison does not work in this case. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Part I: the issues* The tale of Ticketogo, or Does My Bus Look Big in this Licensing Scheme? [read post]
1 May 2015, 11:56 am
 Her call.That does indeed seem to be what the rule says. [read post]