Search for: "Case Under Seal"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 6,727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2016, 12:48 pm
Often times the Forbess Law Firm has been hired at the same time to handle the initial case as well as the Sealing and Expunging process once the case has either been dropped or resolved. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
., over public displays of religious symbols on water towers, on government property and on official village seals. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am
Rigsby, in which the court ruled that a violation of the seal requirement does not mandate dismissal of a suit brought under the False Claims Act, maintaining that although the “Court, in its concluding remarks, sought to address the concerns … that failure to require mandatory dismissal for violation of the seal would encourage relators to harass defendants into settling claims by leaking embarrassing stories to the news media,” “given the extreme… [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 4:18 am
Rigsby, in which the court ruled that a violation of the seal requirement does not mandate dismissal of a suit brought under the False Claims Act, observing that the “main effect of the Court’s opinion is that it simply put an end to the argument over whether a seal violation mandates dismissal” and that the “precise factors that district courts should consider in exercising their discretion in formulating sanctions for seal violations… [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am
Rigsby, in which the court ruled that a violation of the seal requirement does not mandate dismissal of a suit brought under the False Claims Act, concluding that the “Supreme Court has placed responsibility for penalizing seal violations under the False Claims Act (FCA) squarely where it belongs: At the ‘sound discretion’ of the district court whose order was broken. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:50 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously Tuesday that violation of a seal under which a relator's complaint has been filed does not require dismissal of the entire complaint, upholding a fraud verdict against State Farm Fire & Casualty Company [corporate website] stemming from Hurricane Katrina. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
Rigsby, the court affirmed an appeals court’s ruling that a violation of the seal requirement does not mandate dismissal of a suit brought under the False Claims Act. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:57 am
Last Thursday here in Dallas, the seal on a November 16, 2016, federal grand jury indictment was removed. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:43 pm
In this case, the relator’s attorney publicized the complaint while the case was still under seal. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:20 am
Rigsby ruling that breaches to the confidentiality (or seal) provision of a case brought under the FCA will not result in an automatic dismissal of the case. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
What about the interior of vacuum sealed salmon that are inside a Styrofoam container in the trunk of a car? [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 7:59 am
What about the interior of vacuum sealed salmon that are inside a Styrofoam container in the trunk of a car? [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:47 am
This is an important development: under current VA rules and practice, there is no option to appeal to an impartial administrative forum like OHA. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
But those records are under seal. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:41 am
Accordingly, he argues that his challenges to the conditions should be reviewed under an abuse-of-discretion standard rather than a plain-error standard because there’s a First Circuit case that says that’s the remedy. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 2:29 am
Too much is under the control of the parties, especially in our adversarial system, where even in the Supreme Court we debate whether it would be proper to decide the case on a basis not put forward by either party. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:35 am
The record will be sealed. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:35 am
The record will be sealed. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 8:16 am
Under the False Claims Act the three whistleblowers stand to collectively receive $31.25 million from the settlement. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
The case centered around pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
