Search for: "Contain-A-Way Inc." Results 2741 - 2760 of 7,470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
In this way a patentee’s representations may “unofficially” inform the trial judge’s construction and validity analysis in any event. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Kit Case
The first willful violation was for storing merchandise in a way that created a serious hazard. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 9:02 am by David Oxenford
In that argument, the record companies are contending that they should be able to sue services that host user-generated content containing pre-1972 recordings, as Section 512 gives the host immunity against copyright claims, and such copyright claims should be interpreted as being only those that arise under Federal law. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am by Dwayne Sam and Megan Brown
” Aside from the two-part test, which offers little in the way of guidance, PTO examiners have no standards to apply to the exercise of their discretion. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
To determine whether the mark itself, or matter contained within the mark, corresponds to any of the bars in Section 2 (with the exception of the bar on utilitarian functionality), the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
"The lack of harmonisation was brought into sharp focus in the recent English High Court case of NVIDIA Corp v Hardware Labs Performance Systems Inc [2016] EWHC 3135 (Ch). [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 6:27 am by Eugene Volokh
Sloan’s client, M & M Inc., was distributing a laundry product called Crystal Wash. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 10:50 am by Micah T. Saul
Fill your drink menu with beverages that contain relatively low amounts of alcohol. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:47 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Power Integrations, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:46 am by Kerry Sheehan
Two landmark Supreme Court cases, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. [read post]