Search for: "Dept of Justice" Results 2741 - 2760 of 3,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2008, 4:47 pm
Washington Post 6/24/08 Report sees illegal hiring practices as Justice Dept. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
  The court's January 4, 2008 decision, written by Justice Charles E. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:53 am
Dept. of Justice, Sex Offenders have the LOWEST recidivism rate of any criminal category, next to murder. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:52 pm
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, __ N.Y.S.2d __, 2008 WL 1823427 (2nd Dept.), 2008 Slip Op. 03578).Since there is no legal basis upon which the insurer could be liable for coverage, there was no obligation to provide a defense or to indemnify the insured. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 7:46 pm
In dissent, Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Stevens, argued that § 1146(a) is ambiguous. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 3:51 pm
Oregon Dept of Agriculture, where a six-justice majority held that government employees could not challenge employment... [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:33 am
The post summarizes some of the intrigues behind Juris, the Dept. of Justice’s erstwhile legal research system. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:37 pm
Oregon Dept of Agriculture, where a six-justice majority held that government employees could not challenge employment decisions as equal protection violations under the "class of one" theory of  Village of Willowbrook v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
Today’s opinion by Justice Thomas in Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 1:44 pm
Justice Scalia dissented, joined by the Chief Justice and Justice Thomas. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 7:39 am
Co., 306 AD2d 806; Lake Carmel Fire Dept., Inc. v Utica First Ins. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Sec. of Dept. of Children and Family Servs., 358 F.3d 804, 817 (11th Cir. 2004) ('We conclude that it is a strained and ultimately incorrect reading of Lawrence to interpret it to announce a new fundamental right.'). [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:53 pm
Justice Stevens, joined by Justices Souter and Ginsburg, dissented. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:00 pm
The Court’s decision, authored by Chief Justice Roberts, rejects the “class of one” theory of equal protection in the public employment context. [read post]