Search for: "Does v. United States of America" Results 2741 - 2760 of 4,684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
Mar. 21, 2014) (paragraph break added): If the facts alleged in the complaint are true, this case involves an incident that is more like home raids by Red Guards during China’s Cultural Revolution than like what we should expect in the United States of America. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm by Ben
 Last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided largely in favour of Mr. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:14 am by Ronald Mann
I should add, in the interest of candor, that I worked on the brief and presented oral argument on behalf of the United States in Dewsnup v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
(“Danisco”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing Danisco’s declaratory judgment action against Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although it was no longer unanimous, five years later the Court reached the same conclusion with respect to a New Jersey anti-discrimination law in Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On March 10, 2014, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Corporate Culture That Weighs Against Hobby Lobby Being a Religious Entity RFRA was not the first statute ever enacted in the United States and must be considered in light of entrenched understandings of law that preceded it. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Impact of Windsor These recent rulings are fueled by the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:40 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Bartrum, The Curious Case of Legislative Prayer: Town of Greece v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]