Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 2741 - 2760 of 7,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog had a post on regulatory developments affecting social media use  in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:53 am
Anyone can challenge a patent in court proceedings, so the act of state doctrine was not an impediment, even if validity were in issue. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm
”This is contrary to the normal position under English law that once final relief is granted, parties are not entitled to come back to court. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Further, the elements of the cause of action of negligence, together with the threshold stated by this Court in Mustapha v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Court of Appeals says that ESL instructors for a private educational entity are not entitled to overtime.The case is Fernandez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 7:37 am by Dennis Crouch
And what does this have to do with Impression Products v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
 There is a continuing downward trend in the volume of libel litigation in the English Courts. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s decision this week to review Husted v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by Joy Waltemath
The court found that the employer was engaged in teaching English and that the exemption was not limited to the law’s non-inclusive list of covered institutions (Fernandez v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[v] Therefore I can confidently state that CanLII’s national market will earn more than enough money. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am by EEM
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit issued its opinion in the case of IRAP v. [read post]