Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 11,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2011, 8:46 am
In Cape Flattery Limited v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:34 am
Here is the abstract: This is a review essay on The Limitation of Charter Rights: Critical Essays on R. v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:01 am
Fans of adverbs — and of statutory interpretation — might be interested in the case of Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:44 pm
In Grotheer v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:06 pm
In Patel v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:42 am
No need to panic following Neurim v Mylan - the English court is still ready and willing to grant interim injunctions in IP claims (where the facts support this). [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 6:06 am
" (McKinney v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
Oatly did not dispute their inclusion, but sought to add those consumers who are ‘deemed’ English-speaking, in Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland and Sweden, thanks to their high level of English ability. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
* For an issue estoppel to arise in the English courts by reference to a judgment of a court in another jurisdiction, the claimant had to show not only that the requirements to establish an issue estoppel according to the English law were satisfied, but also that the issue in question would be treated as res judicata according to the law of the foreign jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:14 am
The STS and FTS therefore represent a further evolution in the English courts to increase the commercial attractiveness and competitiveness of the English litigation system, rivaling perhaps the UPC. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:12 am
Oregon and Johnson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:48 am
"The Second Circuit held years ago (Haley v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 7:36 am
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 8:12 am
The only Second Circuit case since 2006 that favors the plaintiff is Jackler v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:19 am
Thus, the requirements established in Circular 033/2016 for registering 3D trademarks were not fulfilled.Turning to designs, David Musker blogs on MARQUES CLASS 99 about the case Chanel SAS v EUIPO, ECLI:EU:T:207:517, T-57/16 (not in English yet). [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 10:30 pm
V. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:16 am
See Michaels v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 12:08 pm
CONTENTSIntroduction: Dark Shapes 1Angels in the House 4At Home with the Dombeys 9The Disease of Reading 16Pleasing and Teaching 241 Criminal Conversations 29One Person in Law 32Newcome v Lord Highgate 38Carlyle v Carlyle 46Oh Reader! [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:40 am
The following text is an inofficial English translation of the article ProtonMail bietet freiwillig Hand für Echtzeit-Überwachungen as published on 23 May 2019 in German. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:03 am
Dhillon v. [read post]
