Search for: "Fair v. State" Results 2741 - 2760 of 27,756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Marion County Elections Board, which allowed states to enforce voter ID laws and make it harder for people to vote The Court v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:36 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in  Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm by Amy Howe
Gore: whether the state court decision is “such a sharp departure from the state’s ordinary modes of constitutional interpretation that it lacks any fair and substantial basis in state law. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm
I was keenly interested in reading this opinion at the outset because it involves a lawsuit against In-N-Out Burgers, which has a fair amount of cachet in the youthful fast food world. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Court of Appeal created a process R. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:11 pm
On Tuesday the Nevada Supreme Court heard argument in Townsend v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The long-awaited decision in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334 has brought some badly-needed clarity and certainty to the law of libel, and it seems fair to say that reports of the death of the libel writ have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The long-awaited decision in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334 has brought some badly-needed clarity and certainty to the law of libel, and it seems fair to say that reports of the death of the libel writ have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The long-awaited decision in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334 has brought some badly-needed clarity and certainty to the law of libel, and it seems fair to say that reports of the death of the libel writ have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, (SD MI, filed 5/3/2013) claimed that the zoning denials violated RLUIPA, the federal Fair Housing Act and the speech and religion protections in the federal and state constitutions. [read post]