Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 2741 - 2760 of 57,579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2016, 2:25 pm by Thomas Kidera
  On November 14, 2016, plaintiff Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB“) and defendants RBS Securities Inc., RBS Acceptance, Inc., RBS Financial Products, Inc., and RBS Holdings, USA (Inc.) [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:13 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
A 36-count indictment charges that Mount Pleasant native Jian-Yun Dong and one of his companies, Vaxima, Inc., committed a number of offenses relating to the fraudulent use and conversion of funds received as federal grants. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office ("Myriad") case, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. supports reversal of the District Court's decision and asks the Federal Circuit "to provide clear guidance on patent-eligibility to remove the unnecessary cloud cast by the decision below. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 4:57 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The Federal Circuit affirmed this holding, distinguishing Voter Verified, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 1:50 pm
The Accident A mother and daughter paid for a Yamaha WaveRunner tour around Key West conducted by Sunset Waverunner Tours, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 6:44 am
Such forum selection provisions were broadly implemented in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 7:02 am
The Uhms enrolled in a Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit through Humana Health Plans, Inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:30 am by Tom Kosakowski
Some of its other 223 clients Trimble Inc., General Dynamics Corp., L3 Technologies Inc., General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc., and Northrop Grumman Corp. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The rationale: courts look to the totality of the circumstances when assessing a non-compete's reasonableness, so the same view should color their view as to consideration.The Northern District of Illinois followed this very reasoning in Traffic Tech, Inc. v. [read post]