Search for: "Fish v. State"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 3,437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2010, 6:43 am
There's a new discovery battlefield developing across the Pennsylvania legal landscape and the defense has taken the first hill.The case of McMillen v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
Upon ingestion, the spores leave their dormant state and become active in the intestines. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:32 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run September 26,2010.To retrieve the text of any of the New York Chapter laws listed below, go to http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/menuf.cgiChapter Bill No. 483 A924E DelMonte (MS) -- Authorizes the department of environmental conservation to promulgate standards authorizing hunting with a crossbow; repealer BLURB : En Con L. hunting w/crossbow Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 483 09/17/2010 takes effect 10/1/2010, except that… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:23 am
Modefine S.A. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:13 am
(See Keeton v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Service, (9th Cir. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:35 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit amended an opinion it filed earlier this year in Butte Environmental Council v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm
v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:58 pm
According to the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (DFWR), "deer are reaching a saturation point in many parts of the Commonwealth. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm
App. 2005); State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:30 am
In Western Watersheds Project v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm
(For example, in Telecommunications Research & Action v. [read post]
Interpreting plant provisions of the ESA, 9th Circuit shows restraint, encourages FWS to adopt rules
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
” Steel Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
See F.C.C. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:23 am
In a short response to the Petitioners, Assistant EPA Administrator Stephen Owens stated: After careful review, EPA has determined that TSCA, does not provide the Agency with the authority to address lead shot and bullets as requested in your petition due to the exclusion found in TSCA sec. 3(2)(B)(v). [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
A California appellate court, in Barnett v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2009) and Int’l Airport Centers LLC v. [read post]
