Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 2741 - 2760 of 4,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2014, 3:01 am
Case C 445/12 P Rivella International AG v OHIM, Baskaya di Baskays Alim E.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 5:23 am by Florian Mueller
In that case, Apple was on the receiving end of such enforcement, which needlessly inconvenienced many Germany-based Apple customers. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
 In December 2012, just before Christmas, and just before this Kat rejoined the blogging team, Arnold J handed down the decision Microsoft Corp v Motorola Mobility LLC [2012] EWHC 3677 (Pat) (21 December 2012). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 1:31 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Circuit concluded that Bagram was more like the prison in Germany at issue in Johnson v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:21 am by Florian Mueller
All three German Nokia injunctions against HTC were won by lawyers from the Dusseldorf office of the Bird & Bird firm.Another Nokia v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Trospium chloride, made by Madaus, was sold as "Céris" in France, as "uriVesc" in Germany and as “Regurin” in the United Kingdom -- where Madaus owned the United Kingdom trade mark REGURIN for pharmaceutical preparations etc in Class 5. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:30 am by Dan Ernst
Part V deals with the heart of the contemporary corporate governance debate. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 2:26 am by Tessa Shepperson
Samir discusses housing law in Germany and Brazil. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 11:03 am by Monique Altheim
Officials Respond to EU Concerns Over #SafeHarbor Data Transfer Program http://ow.ly/rR9D2  #EUDataP EU-US ‘Safe Harbour’ under threat as US castigates EU Parliament over Snowden http://ow.ly/rTXwR  #safeharbor #EUDataP     Facebook posts and Free Speech    Police Officer’s Facebook Post Criticizing Her Boss Isn’t Protected Speech Graziosi v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:55 am
”Shortly after the ruling was released Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Peter MacKay issued the following statement:"I am concerned that, with its ruling in the case of Attorney General of Canada v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:48 am by Matthew Hunter
(v) Authorities should be required to notify individuals of the access, at least after the event when there is no risk that the purpose for accessing the data would be compromised. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:05 am by Florian Mueller
The next court to look at this will presumably the United States District for the Southern District of Florida at next year's Motorola v. [read post]