Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 3,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
(IP Dragon) Taiwanese patent fund changes tack and shifts focus to blocking competitors in China (IAM) Does drinking GI protected Oolong tea help the local farmers? [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 3:29 pm
Harris, 2019 WL 6704996 (E.D. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:40 am
Tatel and Senior Circuit Judge Harry T. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:45 am
It happened to be the lower court’s ruling in Shapiro v Ettison, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670 [U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2015]. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 11:46 am
Hammond v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm
K-V Pharm. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 8:13 pm
A recent example of why such self-prepared agreements are problematic was illustrated in a recent case, Scully v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
Canada Last week the Supreme Court delivered a strong affirmation on the importance of copyright balance and the role of technological neutrality, confirming that “[c]opyright law does not exist solely for the benefit of authors,” SOCAN v Entertainment Software Association. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Hedgepath, 607 A.2d 1238, 1247 & n.8 (D.C. 1992) (adopting permissive rationale of Doe v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:38 pm
Harris, 192 Cal. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:33 am
Just because she does not know, in any given instance, that surveillance is taking place, it does not make it any the less distressing for her. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:12 am
Does the justificatory framework support the outcome in the Nuclear Tests cases? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
Harris Corp., 156 F.3d 1182, 1192 (Fed. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
Does television hold the key to better press regulation? [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
Byline Investigates had a piece “Lord Rothermere’s Mail on Sunday suffers ANOTHER humiliating defeat in the libel courts – just months after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle won their pay-outs”. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm
ColbWhen I served as a law clerk to Justice Harry A. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
That case—G.G. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
Scene V. [read post]
