Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 2741 - 2760
of 182,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 8:23 am
I put “benefits” in quotes because there’s an important trade-off in the public’s privacy interests. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:17 pm
It's a ridiculously cold Monday here in Rochester, but nevertheless time for the weekly round up of interesting posts from my fellow New York law bloggers.And, let me reiterate that I do my best to include posts of interest to my readers-New York lawyers.Due to the increasing number of New York blawgs and time restraints, I can't include posts from every blog each week. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:33 am
The FCC previously allowed AT&T to buy Time Warner without having to undergo a lengthy public-interest review, despite pushback from Democrats in the Senate and FCC. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:31 am
More disclosure and less ability to raise fees and interest rates after the fact.Here's a summary.Steady rate for first year of an account.45 days in advance of change in interest rates.No fees for online bill pay.No interest rate raises unless customer is over 60 days late.Restoration of original interest rate if customer makes six on-time payments in a row.No over-limit fees unless customers are told that the purchase puts them over their limit and… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
T 79/91 [2.2-2.5], and T 246/91, point 7 (both not published in OJ). [1.8] In connection with the interpretation of R 57a EPC 1973 (now R 80) [the patent proprietor] referred to decisions T 1138/02, T 181/02, T 223/97, T 610/95, G 1/84, G 9/93, and G 1/05. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 9:06 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement which was at the time of its making so far contrary to the declarant's pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far tended to subject... [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 2:15 pm
But, first, it's interesting that this ruling should come so soon after [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:06 pm
It's an interesting, rare, discussion. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 3:51 pm
Of course I’m familiar with all the disclaimers that remind us that digest summaries aren’t part of the opinion and don’t reflect the view of the court, but since I read to the bottom of the actual opinion without being able to tell if Article 120 is facially defective (see earlier post, here), it’s interesting to see how a member of the court’s staff sees it. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 6:03 am
The LA Times has a piece on the 5Pointz lawsuit, which is still awaiting decision, including an interesting point from Columbia's Pippa Loengard. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 11:31 am
Even though we all know it isn’t true, it’s easy to view credit as “free money. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
We’ll end the week by visiting 717 Madison Place – for those of you who don’t recognize that address (I didn’t), it’s where the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is located, in Washington, D.C. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
Don’t miss your opportunity to be heard about what’s new and interesting in legal knowledge management! [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:40 pm
In the interest of [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:06 am
I won’t discuss this because it’s a pending case, but there’s some interesting tidbits in the report. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 2:03 pm
--BC (Things may be slow this weekend; I'm at the Austin City Limits Festival and don't have... [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:43 am
Given that the City of Portland can't seem to borrow enough money from these guys, the charges and settlement are most interesting. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
And yet it has $250 million (plus interest) for the Mystery Train from Portland to Milwaukie. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 4:55 am
I just came upon this interesting video of the February 2009 event marking the occasion. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 2:43 am
This is not an elder law specific topic so if that doesn't interest you, stop reading now (we have plenty of elder law specific posts in the archives). [read post]
