Search for: "In Re: White v." Results 2741 - 2760 of 4,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2013, 10:14 am by Eric
[Photo credit: white roadsign with a commitment concept // ShutterStock] [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 4:56 am by Ed Felten
If you’re motivated by phone unlocking, or if you’re passionate about preserving white-hat research, or if you’re trying to protect the legality of a legitimate but disruptive product, what you’re really fighting for is the freedom to tinker. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
”[7] An anonymous, unclassified white paper leaked to NBC News prompts more questions than it answers. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am by Susan Brenner
’ Police surveillance verified [Burgos]'s residence as 1315 Muhlenberg Street in the City of Reading and [Burgos] operated a white Dodge Ram pickup truck bearing Pennsylvania registration YVE–1957. . . . [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:04 am by John L. Welch
In re Thomas White Int'l, Ltd., Serial No. 77080379 (February 28, 2013) [precedential].The specimen of use was a 52-page "pdf" entitled "Annual Report" for investment funds named "Thomas White Funds," for which applicant is the advisor. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  But his list would be a remarkable beginning: (1) Eliminate gerrymandered Congressional districts (which could be done with lawsuits); (2) End the Senate’s dysfunctional filibuster rules (which should have been done earlier, but Democrats got suckered again by Republicans); (3) Adjust corrupt lobbying laws that now unduly favor former members of Congress working for special interests; (4) Aggressively test and re-test the Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling (Democrats… [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm by Amy Howe
  He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
Thanks to Eric White for compiling and drafting this update. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]