Search for: "JOHN DOE #2" Results 2741 - 2760 of 13,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
Second, as the Board observed in a footnote, even if there such a narrower restriction had been included, there is still no restriction on registrant's channels of trade, which could include, for example, hot rod dealers.The Board therefore concluded that the channels of trade must be considered similar, and in light of the "essentially identical" marks and the similar goods and services, it affirmed the 2(d) refusal.TTABlog note: The late Boyd Coddington, I have learned, was… [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:59 am by Charles Geyh
ShareCharles Gardner Geyh is Distinguished Professor and John F. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:54 pm by Brad Wendel
  John's move is to deny that the law really bans the mailings with the clear windows, and to fall back on (1) prudential considerations -- the Postal Service is going to be pretty annoyed, and (2) the likelihood of sanctions being low. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
“Religion, Democracy, and Equality” August 21-23, 2013 ICLARS Program Draft Wednesday August 21, 2013 Hilton Garden Inn Richmond, Virginia Young Scholar Sessions 2-2:50 p.m. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:13 am by David Friedman
Back of the Envelope Thoughts on Teaching: 2 Thoughts on Teaching: 1 The Abuse of Statistics John Marshall has made his decision Slander Why I Believe Things Who to Trust Recognizing Theories Tribal Loyalty Not What We Intended A Positive Account of Rights Recipes Fictional Saints Libertarian Arguments for Income Redistribution Ignorance of Politicians Race, Gender and IQ I Have Seen the Past — and It Works Bad for Us, Bad for You, Bad More on Politics Political Thoughts… [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 3:26 am by John L. Welch
The Board was unimpressed by these assertions: it refused to take judicial notice of any facts purportedly underlying these accusations, found no supporting evidence in the record, and saw no egregious conduct in opposer's conduct of the opposition.And so the Board sustained the opposition on the Section 2(d) ground, declining to reach opposer's dilution claim.Read comments and post your comments here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:02 am
The Board also affirmed an alternative refusal based on Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness and lack of acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:51 am
"Children would no doubt be involved, does a 'smart' policy advocating removing them from their families for 2+ weeks? [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:13 am
In any event, I think NEW SILK ROAD does imply that the goods are made of silk.Text Copyright John L. [read post]