Search for: "LEVY V. LEVY" Results 2741 - 2760 of 3,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2024, 9:19 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
Some steps need to be followed: “The levying officer must have failed to take custody of the property; made demand of the judgment debtor, if the debtor can be located; the levying officer must then make a return that the property cannot be obtained” (para 31). [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
., In re Anonymous Online Speakers, 661 F.3d 1168, 1173 (9th Cir. 2011) (discussing the "fear of economic or official retaliation") [2] For an example of the threat of such ostracism, levied against the writer of anonymous letter, see Brief of Appellee Rabbi Jack Bieler, Hager-Katz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am by Heidi Henson
But imposition of a tax nonetheless leaves an individual with a lawful choice to do or not do a certain act, so long as he is willing to pay a tax levied on that choice. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:16 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe has adopted on July 4th a Declaration of the Committee of Ministers on the Desirability of International Standards dealing with Forum Shopping in respect of Defamation, “Libel Tourism”, to Ensure Freedom of Expression. 1. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
" ruling in Thuiskopie v Opus for jiplp. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 1:34 pm by Patricia Hughes
The RCMP stopped him and issued a fine of $240, costs and the victim surcharge levy. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:09 pm by Howard Knopf
AUCC’s objection was filed by Glen Bloom, who acted for the law publishers in the CCH v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:34 pm by Howard Knopf
This is potentially a cost of $6.5 million a year for Canadian taxpayers, which seems absurd in view of the Supreme Court of Canada's CCH v. [read post]