Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant" Results 2741 - 2760 of 3,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
  Accordingly, the House of Lords regarded it impossible for the claimant to prove the liability of a single defendant by applying the conventional “but for” test, which would cause injustice to the claimant. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am by Joel R. Brandes
The parties also stipulated, that they each retain their own pension rights as separate property. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:57 am by Kara OBrien
According to its Enforcement Manual, the SEC’s NPA imposes two basic requirements upon the defendant: to cooperate fully and truthfully in the SEC’s investigation, and [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:30 am by Vivian Persand
The parties each moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
 Accordingly, we reject Plaintiff's argument that the trial court erred in declining to impose liability against Defendants under principles of common-law negligence. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:02 am by Vivian Persand
April 5, 2011).The Defendant/Appellant, Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:29 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
This equates to more than 100,000 children, teenagers and adults sustaining untimely deaths each and every year. [read post]
10 May 2011, 5:09 am by SHG
"  The page claimed that the firm has "a history of winning [products liability] cases" and that it employs "defective products liability lawyers" who "understand how to deal with both corporations and insurance companies and have a history of winning cases for our clients. [read post]
8 May 2011, 4:29 pm
If a plaintiff is found to be 50% (or less) liable, each defendant shall be liable for their proportionate total dollar amount awarded as damages. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:45 pm by Ben Vernia
The defendant’s practices did not make the interest subsidy and special allowance certifications false, the court reasoned, because for those, the company only certified that the data for each claim was accurate. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:01 pm by rnahoum
If it appears to the court that the defendant is on active duty, the court is precluded from entering a judgment against the defendant until an attorney is appointed to represent the service-member. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Factual Background In Halliburton, the shareholder plaintiffs maintain that from 1999 to 2001, Halliburton made false and misleading statements that understated its asbestos liability and overstated its revenues. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:39 pm by admin
It was held before the Supreme Court of Virginia and involved a dispute over whether a defendant in the above-referenced Kivalina case (presently on appeal to the Ninth Circuit, having been dismissed by the lower federal court) is entitled to a defense by its general liability insurance company. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:30 am
For health care providers that are insured by the state, they have their liability limited to $100,000 as described in the Patient Compensation Funds and Physicians Insurance. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by David A. Wolf
Since this is somewhat confusing concept that is evaluated case by case and policy by policy, it is often helpful to have a Florida Child Injury Lawyer evaluate the case, liability, and applicable insurance coverage (if any). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:00 am by Kara OBrien
As one group of insurance companies argued, the Fifth Circuit’s opinion was appropriate because district courts should conduct “rigorous analysis” of class certification requirements in order to balance judicial economy with fairness to defendants. [read post]