Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 5,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
NOT THE LAST WORD ON THE MATTER Because the appeal resulted in the reversal of a summary judgment in favor of the lawfirm defendants, the case will go back to the trial court for further litigation in light of the appellate court's resolution of legal issues. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 3:28 am
Ramos in Goldstein v Pikus, 2015 NY Slip Op 31455(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 20, 2015], dismissing a petition for judicial dissolution of a New York limited liability company. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The wife was also a member of a pension system as a State employee. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Conventional wisdom has it that the product shape has no prospect of registration in light of the advice given to the CJEU by the Attorney General, but trade mark enthusiast and seasoned practitioner Roland Mallinson (Taylor Wessing LLP) wonders whether this view is wrong. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 5:20 am
Kehoe Component Sales Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:03 am
A: it’s not good that you can go under ©’s low bar. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm
K-V Pharm. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:25 pm
The plan, which was implemented in light of the necessary actions needed to address the fire safety issues, as well as other cost concerns, involved having approximately 15-20 employees (out of a total of around 300) work at a time, on a rotational basis. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:44 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:44 am
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY Jane Doe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
The definition of “essential health benefits” as implemented by the Tri-Agency regulations is complicated and generally varies by state, even when the group health plan is self-insured. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm
Judge Rakoff was having none of that, highlighting the fact that the company benefitted greatly from the scheme for years, until the scheme finally came to light. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
Interestingly, the Court stated that "to some extent overbreadth is unavoidable given the imprecision of our language. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:37 am
My understanding is that municipalities moved away from them after Shavitz v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is Sciscoe, et. al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is Sierra Club, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:37 pm
To quote the lead opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:40 pm
In Lola v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:40 pm
In Lola v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 7:28 am
It also stated that light duty would only be considered based on an acceptable physician’s report, but the employee’s doctor did not recommend light duty. [read post]
