Search for: "London v. State"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 4,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm
City of New London, which ruled that it was permissible for government to condemn private property for transfer to private parties in order to promote “economic development. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:00 am
It relied on the decision in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386 as authority for the proposition that a term of uncertain duration cannot create a lease and that consequently, the entire occupancy agreement was void (including cl.6). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
As in the United States, pre-merger integration, coordination and/or information sharing is an important antitrust issue under Canada's Competition Act. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
The rest of the next two weeks were work and rain inundated - so much so, that with all the London-cheerleading she was undertaking she has been feeling distinctly English... [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
While I think the use of eminent domain by the city of New London was horrendous policy, and I fully support efforts to constrain such eminent domain abuse through legislation and state constitutional amendments, I am not convinced such actions are barred by the Fifth Amendment, as I explained here and here. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm
"- Antonin Scalia, oral arguments, US v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm
City of New London generated a record political backlash. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:11 am
Supreme Court Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd [2011] UKSC 32 (9 November 2011) Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 (9 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P [2011] EWCA Civ 1257 (09 November 2011) Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GMBH & Ors v Carefusion 303 Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 1288 (08 November 2011) SH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1284 (08… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
The officer who conducted the search stated that he was looking for articles such as chalk, spray paint or highlighters that had been used in similar protests. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:37 pm
Mississippi is one of only seven states that has not enacted any eminent domain reforms at all since the Supreme Court’s decision controversial decision upholding “economic development” takings in Kelo v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
London, U.K. - The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has ruled against Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly & Company in a patent dispute. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
Old Cinema, University of Westminster, 309 Regent Street, London W1. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
City of New London, the Supreme Court categorically rejected the idea that the state may take property under the pretext of a public purpose. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
