Search for: "MARK ROBERTS " Results 2741 - 2760 of 8,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm by Dan Stein
  Further coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Pete Williams and Erin McClam of NBC News, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Richard Wolf and Brad Heath of USA Today, Bill Mears of CNN, Fox News, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, Stephanie Condon of CBS News, Martin J. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Character, word, and number of word lengths are increasing in applications, suggesting increasing resort to longer/less “shorthandy” marks that may function less well as marks. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In Two Pesos, the Supreme Court tells us that “the general principles qualifying a mark for registration under § 2 of the Lanham Act are for the most part applicable in determining whether an unregistered mark is entitled to protection under § 43(a). [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
EDTQ    Robert, has he talked to Gates? [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
Raimondo overruling Chevron marks a sea change in administrative law, but commentators have already disagreed about whether the decision is a big deal. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 3:26 am by INFORRM
  On Monday Robert Jay QC provided an overview of the Inquiry’s purposes and concerns. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Chief Justice Roberts' opinion for the bare majority trims back the "third party" doctrine that one has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information belonging to and in the custody of a third party such as a telephone company. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:07 am by SHG
Between Frank Hogan and Robert Morgenthau, they owned the office for 65 years. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:07 am by Kendall Gray
You know, I hear all the time about what a great advocate and Supreme Court practitioner Chief Justice Roberts was. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:53 pm by Richard Granat
Journal , titled "Time to Deregulate the Practice of Law", by Clifford Winston and Robert W. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am by Frank Cranmer
Public Space Prevention Orders Readers may recall that police in Birmingham charged Isabel Vaughan-Spruce with four counts of failing to comply with a Public Space Protection Order in violation of a “buffer zone” around the British Pregnancy Advisory Service’s Robert Clinic in Kings Norton. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:41 pm by McNabb Ferrari, P.C.
In addition to Pray, Marlow and Benbow, the others indicted include: Randolph Danson, 25, Robert McMillan, 25, Timothy Moon, 23, Robert Smith, 31, Charles Wade, 25, Herman Williams, 19, and Larry Williams, 29. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:41 pm by McNabb Ferrari, P.C.
In addition to Pray, Marlow and Benbow, the others indicted include: Randolph Danson, 25, Robert McMillan, 25, Timothy Moon, 23, Robert Smith, 31, Charles Wade, 25, Herman Williams, 19, and Larry Williams, 29. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Robert Burrell: heritage brand cases in Australia, some of which produce really undesirable results. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm by Carlo Van den Bosch
  Karin Vogel and Robert Stumpf from the appellate group also contributed. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer and Sotomayor dissented in part, agreeing with the Government’s position that the term “scandalous” (but not “immoral”) as used in the statute is susceptible to a narrowing construction that could prohibit only those marks that offend because of their mode of expression (e.g., profanity) without necessarily reaching the ideas or viewpoints they convey. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer and Sotomayor dissented in part, agreeing with the Government’s position that the term “scandalous” (but not “immoral”) as used in the statute is susceptible to a narrowing construction that could prohibit only those marks that offend because of their mode of expression (e.g., profanity) without necessarily reaching the ideas or viewpoints they convey. [read post]