Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 5,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
. * * * [ILB: Note from p. 2 that "[I]n February 2005, Kelsey came to Indianapolis for a job interview with a law firm.] [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
P. 23 or similar State statute or rule of judicial procedure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
P. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:20 pm
There, at p. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:39 pm
No. 111-176, p. 152–153).Article IV of the protocol deals with the confidentiality of nonpublic information, personal data, and professional secrets. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
The Kind of “Felony” Should Matter Any changes made to the commander’s convening authority role will be less justifiable or even plain wrongheaded if they do not acknowledge the distinctions between military-nexus offenses with no civilian analogue (what I’ll call “martial wrongdoing”)—like AWOL, malingering, trainee abuse, disobedience, conduct unbecoming an officer, and various others that may be “prejudicial to good order and… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:52 pm
The PTAB has not issued final decisions in any of these matters. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
As this case presents an issue of first impression, our jurisdiction is pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 1-2(b)(1). 1 Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:09 pm
" 28 U.S.C § 1292(b). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
S A FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a foreign limited liability company, d/b/a OEC LATIN AMERICA, Appellee. 3rd District.Civil procedure -- Dismissal -- Failure to prosecute -- Error to grant motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution where movant did not provide required sixty-day notice required by revised rule and neither movant nor trial court recognized three instances of record activity preceding dismissal -- Any filing of record during applicable time frame is sufficient to preclude… [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
In a more sensible world we should be able to dispose of these matters in a couple of hours and then get on with the important things in life. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
[xxii] 4 Jack B. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Defense Attorney: Thomas P. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:07 pm
The court viewed this attempt as “an end-run around 23(b)(3)’s predominance requirement. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 5:20 am
” (Citing Mark P. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 12:33 pm
James P. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 4:42 am
” In para A5.23 ‘illegal harm’ is being used to describe three different varieties of risk assessment duty: Sections 9(5)(b),(c) and (e). [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
(p. 921). [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
In determining the appropriateness of the P! [read post]
