Search for: "MAY v. MAY" Results 2741 - 2760 of 183,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2019, 1:20 pm
Here's a brief little quiz from a recent case (but not today) while I'm off watching some water polo up in Orange County:Guillermo Saavedra was beaten to death while he was living in the back of the La Casita restaurant in Indio (which has apparently now closed). [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:58 am
I won't say much about the merits of this case, since it's high-profile and will get substantial attention without me. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:39 pm
You could see why the trial court thought it made sense to charge the defendnat in adult criminal court. [read post]
21 May 2025, 4:18 pm
It doesn't matter what you've done, or why you don't want the police to stop you. [read post]
15 May 2015, 11:16 am
Even before reading the opinion, I saw that it was a published death penalty case with Judge Reinhardt as the author. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:17 am
The Court of Appeal publishes this originally-unpublished opinion. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:16 am by SupremeCourtHaiku
Murder in alley No habeas for lookout Respect the jury Opinion:  pdf  html [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
I agree with Judge Wallace.They validly stopped you because your plates expired. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:13 pm
The facts of this death penalty opinion read like a made-for-television movie. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:49 am
I have no problem with this 67-page opinion, which (among other things) holds that it was okay to receive the jury's verdict during the COVID-19 pandemic without the defendant being present when the defendant had COVID-19, was quarantined in jail, and wouldn't be out of quarantine and able to be transported to court for at least two weeks. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:28 pm
"Defendant] was caught transporting (among other drugs) more than 3,600 doses of methamphetamine with a street value between $111,000 and $222,000. . . . [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:45 am
I always like reading opinions that help me be a more successful criminal. [read post]
3 May 2007, 4:21 pm
Judge Tangeman (up in San Luis Obispo) did the right thing, and granted a new trial on damages when the jury pretty clearly awarded attorney Clark Fergus a $1.2 million contingency fee even though they were expressly instructed that Fergus was only entitled to a reasonable (hourly) fee.But while he was right on the merits (in my view), he was wrong on procedure, and issued his factual findings supporting the grant of a new trial 15 days after the verdict, rather than within 10 days. [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:50 pm
Let me just say at the outset: I have one really big question for Justice Wiley after reading this opinion from earlier today. [read post]
29 May 2020, 2:43 pm
When someone takes out a loan and then admits they don't repay it, it's not surprising that (1) the trial court will find in favor of the plaintiff suing for the loan, and (2) the Court of Appeal will affirm.The defendant (Mr. [read post]