Search for: "Mark I. Congress" Results 2741 - 2760 of 7,023
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2017, 4:28 am by Jon Hyman
…  In my message to Congress in January of this very year, I recommended the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:28 am by Jon Hyman
…  In my message to Congress in January of this very year, I recommended the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:34 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
And I say that with Nixon and “Deep Throat” (Mark Felt[1]) fully in mind. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 12:20 am by Bill Otis
 No matter what their political beliefs, they have conducted themselves with the circumspection and restraint their power assumes, and requires.As is clear by now, I have never encountered US District Judge Mark Bennett of Iowa, formerly  --  and, so it would seem, presently  --  a powerhouse in the ACLU.Judge Bennett recently gave a long speech to (at least) a CNN audience on how Congress is a bunch of callous ciphers. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 8:41 pm by Bill Otis
 I am unable to recall similar enthusiasm on that side for wanting to make it easier to convict, say, defendants who were killers or rapists. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 11:41 am by Mike Mireles
 For more on belief and patents, see Professor Mark Lemley’s article Faith-Based Intellectual Property. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm by Ronald Mann
Exaggerating somewhat, Kagan quips that “the employees ask us to treat those words as stray marks on a page – notations that Congress regrettably made but did not really intend. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
” For reasons I highlighted in Part IV of this series, I am not convinced the Mandel test is applicable until an actual denial is issued. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm by Josh Blackman
The Court deferred to the discretion Congress “properly . . . placed in the hands of the Executive. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Ross, Samford University, has published World War I and the American Constitution, with Cambridge University Press. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:19 am by Andrew Kent
In an 1864 decision, the Supreme Court implied that the military detention and trial of a Democratic politician in Ohio were legal, as I described here (pp. 1907-11). [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
The court’s use of the word “recharacterized” marks an important rhetorical move: it rejects the notion that Trump replacement of the Muslim ban with a territory-based ban was intended to promote national security and instead views the territory-based ban as a pretext for the original Muslim ban. [read post]
25 May 2017, 6:06 pm by Joseph Fishkin
 It’s possible that in this case Mulvaney may have miscalculated and overshot the mark. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:54 pm by Jim Martin
As the nation commemorates the centennial marking U.S. entry into World War I, the Law Library and Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress are gathering a panel of five eminent scholars to debate the meaning of the war on civil liberties. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:33 am by J. Dana Stuster
The Obama administration was often criticized by members of Congress for its reticence to defend U.S. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:35 pm by Jake Siegel
The crowdfunding industry has continued to grow rapidly and has raised over $12 billion worldwide as of February 2017[i]. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am by Victoria Kwan
Mark Walsh has a summary of the festivities. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am by James Kachmar
I googled it …” has become ubiquitous in every day conversation. [read post]