Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 3,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2011, 8:45 am
However, I must say that I'm really looking forward to the day that I get to file an "apple injuction. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:52 pm
The interface is far smoother than previous iterations; and, this is a function of three improvements: (a) new features to access (b) from more places within the application (c) which is now based in a static background at which I can easily select major tabs for quick access [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
If he does, the State will put A and B to trial together; C will testify that the person in the video is B; B will have to argue that C is mistaken and that the person in the video is A. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
. - (1) The Director- General of Civil Aviation or any other officer specially empowered in this behalf by the Central Government may, from time to time, by order, issue directions, consistent with the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, with respect to any of the matters specified in [clauses (aa), (b), (c), (e), (f), (g), (ga), (gb), (gc)], (h), (i), (m) and (qq) of sub-section (2) of section 5, to any person or persons using any aerodrome or… [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
We therefore respectfully request that, with respect to this exception, NASAA conform its custody rule to that contained in subsection (b)(4) of the SEC’s revised custody rule 206(4)-2, as adopted on December 30, 2009. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:05 am
(Update 2: John Bellinger, who knows this matter better than anyone (possibly excepting Matt Waxman), has a must-read post on the Obama administration’s international law framework in the “fact sheet” at Lawfare. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:03 am
by Kenneth Anderson A few days ago, I asked the question (here), what are the best legal arguments that would permit or preclude military intervention in Libya, by the US or some other party or parties, on humanitarian grounds (other than rescue of one’s own nationals)? [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:30 am
§552(b)(7)(C). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:01 am
Withholding Tax Eliminator, A&M Base Shifting, Alhambra, Pathfinder, and Short Option. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
ICBC, 2005 BCSC 602; c. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:15 am
But I’m okay with the opinion. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:03 am
Data processing can be justified based on "implicit" consent (e.g., Article 7(b) of the EU DPD: "processing is necessary for the performance of a contract to which the data subject is party") or with no consent at all (e.g., Article 7(c) of the EU DPD: "processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation" or Article 7(f): "processing is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller"). [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 7:14 pm
(Notice Model Rule 1.2(b), above.)No, I'm talking about the folks who choose as the goal of their legal representation what we hate. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” (c) The Australian Press Council’s 2007 submission to the Minister for Telecommunication 23 April 2007 The APC suggested, albeit in two paragraphs, that a voluntary code of conduct for bloggers could be considered[8]. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:05 am
I’m not going to deal with the statute here, either; as I noted earlier, in this post I’m only going to focus on the U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
This opinion has and will have a lot of coverage, so I'm not going to give it the long-form analysis here. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:54 am
I'm often asked by clients what business entity they should use. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:39 pm
: “In deciding whether to make some other order, the court must have regard to all the circumstances, including – (a) the conduct of all the parties; (b) the amount, if any, by which the bill of costs has been reduced; and (c) whether it was reasonable for a party to claim the costs of a particular item or to dispute that item. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:11 pm
Note that almost all of these metrics can be easily tracked through Google Analytics. b. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In addition, the Court noted the significant differences between the constitutional and political contexts of the two countries, societal differences, the different position of the media and the degree to which the courts had left matters for judicial interpretation (at 399). [read post]
