Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 2741 - 2760 of 3,728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
As we discussed in our post on NFA annual compliance obligations, commodity pool operators will need to submit annual audited reports to the NFA by March 31 of this year. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 12:30 pm by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan 2010). [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:49 am by Layla Kuhl
The Court held two cases in abeyance pending the outcome of People v Bryant, which is currently pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm by WIMS
The White House said startups bring a wealth of transformative innovations to market, and they also play a critical role in job creation in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:04 am by stu@crimapp.com
Many years ago in Whren v United States, 517 US 806 (1996), the United States Supreme Court upheld the use of pretext based traffic stops. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:03 pm by WIMS
      The United States, representing the interests of the Department of the Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service as amicus curiae, argues that § 9 is ambiguous, that the Appeals Court must apply the deference principles set forth in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Wilcox- Precon Development Corporation v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:24 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that principle under the United States Constitution....... [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm by stu@crimapp.com
The key holding is that the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Padilla v Kentucky applies to sex offender registry consequences. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:27 am by Timothy P. Flynn
With New York finally following the rest of the states in 2009, all 50-states now have "no fault" divorce laws on the books. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:43 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
  The court relied upon the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court in Padilla v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm by Peter Tillers
O' Hair Professor of Evidence & Procedure, Michigan State University School of Law. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm by stu@crimapp.com
In Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, 103 SCt 876 (2010),the United States Supreme Court struck down limits on campaign spending by outside organizations. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-6549, relisted 1/7, 1/14; and Howes v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[27]              The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]