Search for: "Miller, Appeal of" Results 2741 - 2760 of 4,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2024, 7:41 am by Eugene Volokh
New York (1968), a pre-Miller case, upheld a law that implemented the then-current obscenity test with "to minors" added at the end of each prong; most lower courts and commentators have assumed that Ginsberg plus Miller justify laws that implement the Miller-based test given above. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm by Christopher G. Hill
Related Musings:Thanks to Greg Shelton at Construction Law CarolinasNo Recoupment Defense to Supplier’s Miller Act ClaimContract Necessities: Don’t Leave Home Without ‘Em! [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 8 March and Thursday 9 March, the Supreme Court will hear the appeals of Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
On appeal, the plaintiff argued that she was denied a fair trial because the court erred in discharging a holdout juror. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
On appeal, the plaintiff argued that she was denied a fair trial because the court erred in discharging a holdout juror. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Court of Appeals in Atlanta (11th Circuit). [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Full Federal Appeals Court in D.C. to Weigh House Subpoena to Ex-White House Counsel Donald McGahn Washington Post – Spencer Hsu | Published: 10/15/2020 The full U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 5:25 am
  At least so we thought until the Court of Appeals issued its decision in Madison Ave. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 5:46 am by Tobin Admin
Yvette Miller said that the Court of Appeals was compelled to conclude that the plaintiff failed to comply with the ante litem requirements and that his complaint against DPS was therefore due to be dismissed. [read post]