Search for: "People v Legall" Results 2741 - 2760 of 30,805
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 5:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On the consent of the People and pursuant to People v Dunaway, Mapp v Ohio and People v Huntley, a hearing was held in this matter on 19 October 2012. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:36 am by The Law Office of David H. Pollack, LLC
The Supreme Court announced its ruling on January 15 ending the lengthy legal battle. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
It stands to reason that people will do so as well. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  While not a legal malpractice report, this disciplinary proceeding explains why some legal malpractice cases are brought. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:02 pm by brian
” And hundreds of years later this same theory, operating under a different name, is first formally written into an American legal decision - Johnson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
I can't say it any better than Judge Reinhardt, who authors the opinion:"As an "attempt" in the state of California requires only "slight acts in furtherance of the [criminal] design," People v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:23 am by Venkat
Power.com does not have an easy road when it comes to legal precedent. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:37 am by INFORRM
The court offered more detailed points of legal significance regarding the relationship between text and photographic image. [read post]
23 May 2023, 1:10 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of the truth became the legal standard after Times v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”It is hard to counter that view when Justices like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito flaunt their political sympathies or when the Court trashed its own precedents on the way to overturning Roe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:54 am by INFORRM
But: ‘Provided, as here, the importance of applying the legal meaning of the section as defined by the trial judge is stressed, there is no risk that the Art 10 right is unlawfully encroached. [read post]