Search for: "People v. Givens" Results 2741 - 2760 of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
  If people cannot bring legitimate issues to court, the creation and maintenance of positive laws will be hampered, as laws will not be given effect. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Hearsay only applies to statements by people—computer-generated statements don’t have a hearsay problem. __ This seems like a win, of sorts, for platforms, although not a great result for Cox specifically. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am by Brian Shiffrin
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Given the power of the modern president--who, incidentally, is prone to declare "exceptional situations" in all sorts of circumstances in order to enhance his own power--we ought to be more willing to try to make sure that we can sleep at night with a given incumbent in office. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am by Eric Goldman
* For over a decade, I’ve implored people to stop using the term “Soft IP. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 8:08 pm
A helpful reader alerted me to a fascinating opinion from the Oregon Court of Appeals in Oregon v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:42 pm
  (Though I think the latter, given Justice Kennedy, has a higher likelihood than the former.) [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
People in the United Kingdom cannot receive PCCM's closed circuit service. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
US could be endangered by US v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
" It seems to me that given (c)(5), there's a potentially serious constitutional problem -- particularly under the Privileges and Immunities Clause -- with these provisions. [read post]