Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 2741 - 2760 of 3,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am by INFORRM
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice assessed defamation damages aggregating $4,773,000 in a case involving claims by 53 plaintiffs against one individual defendant over a targeted campaign involving tens of thousands of postings on the internet. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
After being charged with robbing and killing two people, the first defendant, William Leroy Barnes, “wore the fruits of [his] robbery – a gold necklace and a watch belonging to [one of his victims] – at an early court appearance. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The G&T programs, plaintiffs allege[*3], provide superior academic preparation, which allows primarily white and Asian students to continue through the pipeline to academically screened middle and high schools, relegating Black and Latinx students to unscreened schools, often in poorly maintained buildings with limited extracurricular programs. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The G&T programs, plaintiffs allege[*3], provide superior academic preparation, which allows primarily white and Asian students to continue through the pipeline to academically screened middle and high schools, relegating Black and Latinx students to unscreened schools, often in poorly maintained buildings with limited extracurricular programs. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 12:43 pm by Evan M. Levow
The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division ruled in State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:00 pm by Sinead Ring
Furthermore, what impact will it have on cases taken by victims of people who are granted prohibition in sexual cases? [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 4:03 am
Jonathan HafetzBrennan Center for Justice Wednesday's Supreme Court argument in the Guantanamo detainee cases (Boumediene v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Most people have not had the experience of attending a court proceeding or testifying under oath. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   In reliance on the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 1985 holding in Zuckerman v. [read post]