Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State" Results 2741 - 2760 of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2010, 1:54 pm by Gyi Tsakalakis
Ohio State Bar Assn., supra, at 464-465, or 564*564 commercial speech related to illegal activity, Pittsburgh Press Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Brian Maude
Case in point: on June 17th, the United States Supreme Court (in the case of City of Ontario v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
However, disclosures of confidential information which are made in the public interest may avoid liability where a court considers the public interest in maintaining confidence is outweighed by the countervailing public interest in disclosure. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Levi Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago Law School. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by velvel
In the fourth of the cases, Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am by Rosalind English
It lures us into the seductive myths of sustainable development (a rationalisation of our species’ continuing consumption and proliferation) or intergenerational equity (an attempt to co-opt our desire for the competitive superiority of our own genetic offspring into the service of the next generation as a whole). [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
She also refers to Black’s Law Dictionary (though an earlier edition than Justice Fuerst), cites the Courts of Justice Act and Public Service Act, and provides several maxims of statutory interpretation. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  Politics is also more familiar and therefore more accessible to the public than are court decisions. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm by Barry Eagar
Citing MID Sydney Pty Ltd v Australian Tourism Co Ltd (1998) 90 FCR 236, traders conducting their business from the Chifley Tower building in Sydney would not have infringed the plaintiff's trade mark ("Chifley Tower") if they used that name in good faith as the name of their place of business. [read post]