Search for: "SELLERS v. SELLERS"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 5,573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2015, 12:17 pm
[v] See FAST Act Section 84001. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:29 am
It’s a type of deal protection, for example, that would have avoided the seller’s remorse suffered by the unsuccessful plaintiffs in the well-known New York case, Pappas v Tzolis, who sold their majority stake for $1.5 million to the minority owner who, within months, sold the company’s sole asset to a third party for $17.5 million. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
Qi Andrew and Gucci America v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v Rafailov, 41 AD3d 603, 604; see also High Fashions Hair Cutters v Commercial Union Ins. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
In Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:52 am
It ends with an analysis of why the attorney may be subject to legal malpractice and whether he can seek to share the burden with the sellers. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:51 pm
Media Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:29 pm
See Singer v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
" Boys Markets v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:04 pm
.' This testimony, together with the facts that the vehicle was sold and delivered to the Seller more than a year before the instant transaction and that the Buyers carefully inspected the vehicle prior to purchase, make it clear that the agent did not represent the vehicle as new and that the buyers did not act in reliance on a pretense that it was new, as alleged in the indictment. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 7:17 am
” Which category fits the plaintiffs in Tipton v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:17 am
CooperComcast Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:17 am
CooperComcast Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 12:03 pm
This is a major ruling validating the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising, which occurs when an advertiser purchases and displays ads triggered in response to third-party trademarks. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:41 am
Because it applied implied preemption, the decision in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 7:38 am
’ Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 9:47 pm
In Stambovsky v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:05 am
., wrote for the Court in Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
The decision explores the contours of the US Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:44 pm
(David Kopel) A recent Yale Law Journal Online article by Northwestern law professor Andrew Koppelman argues that the Obamacare individual mandate is obviously constitutional, especially in light of how McCulloch v. [read post]
