Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 41,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2022, 9:39 pm
To illustrate this point, imagine a scenario where a non-super power, a state with an average size military and without a permanent seat on the Security Council, invaded a neighboring country. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:41 pm
Factual Background The case – Glacier Northwest Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:54 am
In Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Five years ago, in Kiobel v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:20 am
Connecticut v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
State Election Commission [AIR 1997 P&H 164], in which the High Court was considering a similar question as to whether the Election Tribunal constituted under the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, had the power to pass an injunction so as to restrain an elected representative from assuming office pending adjudication of an election petition filed against him. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
In Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
In Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:51 am
These states developments offer a powerful counter-paradigm to that of the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am
States can of course create rights going beyond those protected by the Convention, but their power to do so exists independently of the Convention and is subject to their own established constitutional principles. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 5:57 am
OF REVENUE v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
§ 1, cl. 1, likewise vests the executive Power in “the President of the United States of America. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:57 pm
Both Michigan v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 10:19 am
On April 29, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:59 pm
Among the cases in my queue awaiting my analysis is Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:33 am
Thefollowing case, Highmark v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
In Lyng v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
”Case of the Day: Seijas v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am
In particular, I have been thinking about it as a result of a gut feeling that the ‘2 v. 3’ debate is largely occurring within a vacuum, with not enough attention being paid to the current (beleaguered) state of the United States’ higher education system as a whole. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
Today, in Sackett v. [read post]
