Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 4,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Court Awards Damages to Man for Intentional Misrepresentation of a Child's Paternity: Hodge v. Craig
25 Oct 2012, 4:56 pm
The Supreme Court of Tennessee, in Hodge v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:49 pm
While defendant refused a request to have a urine sample given for testing, a full DRE was administered at CTS. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
In 1984 in Berkemer v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:05 pm
Abstract: “Despite being around for more than a century in the United States, the role played by ‘treble damages suits’ in cartel enforcement is controversial … Some think of them as exemplars of a hyper litigious society, while others perceive them as essential elements in a rational cartel-enforcement program. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:12 pm
Homeland SecurityThe investigation and arrest of Prokopi is an outgrowth of the civil forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:29 pm
In the United States, that standard is typically “clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:39 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
LLC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:45 am
Attorneys representing “commercial paleontologist” Eric Prokopi filed a motion to dismiss last Friday in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 9:28 am
Four days later, the Corps disclosed 30 new positive test results for Asian carp environmental DNA from samples collected in the Chicago Waterway. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 3:55 pm
The case name is Missouri v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 3:40 pm
The High Court in Missouri v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 10:40 am
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear oral arguments on Missouri v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
But because a “trial court is not bound by the nomenclature used by a party […], the trial court could treat [a motion to suppress] as a motion in limine” State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
But because a “trial court is not bound by the nomenclature used by a party […], the trial court could treat [a motion to suppress] as a motion in limine” State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:40 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 10:00 am
Deane v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 9:31 am
Ryan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
Ed. 2d 610 (2011)(substitute chemist), and Williams v. [read post]
