Search for: "STATE v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 5,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
In McLane v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
” Quoting Shukh v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 9:34 am
Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"Shulman, a member of the Commack Board of Education, was a candidate for reelection.Hunderfund, the school superintendent, believed that Shulman wanted him fired and was opposed to his candidacy. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:12 pm
Board of Education was decided in 1954, several states (for example, my home state of Missouri, I believe) had constitutional amendments that outlawed school integration. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
” The editorial board of the St. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:31 am
Montgomery County Board Of Education In John And Jane Parents 1, the Montgomery County Board of Education (“Board”) adopted gender identity guidelines permitting schools to develop gender support plans for students. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:44 am
The Board answered the call. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:49 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
Board of Education, the Supreme Court thought it “unthinkable” that the Equal Protection Clause would not apply to the federal government as well as the states and declared it “reverse incorporated” through the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:10 am
The agreement was subject to the approval of the Board of Education. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
Link: Read The Opinion Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:39 am
”As the current dispute depends on the interpretation of the CBA's no-layoff clause in order to determine whether that provision is applicable to the Village's action in abolishing six firefighters' positions, the court ruled that this was an issue that the parties agreed to submit to arbitration.Thus, said the court, Supreme Court properly determined that the parties' substantive disagreement as to the meaning and application of the no-layoff clause is to be resolved by… [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:53 am
Good Meat Project v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:06 am
Board of Education. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:49 am
V. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am
The money followed a legal but circuitous route turbocharged by the 2014 ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
