Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 21,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2013, 8:12 am
The opinion in the case of Ruiz Medina v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:24 am
Jerry Brown signed SB 416 Tuesday by State Sen. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
# # #Royalty Only and Odell Cornelius Beckham, Jr. v Nike USA, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:02 am
The agreement included a satisfactory performance provision that required the dealer to maintain a baseline of sales, determined using an index known as the Retail Sales Index (“RSI”). [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 6:38 am
The Plaintiff suggested that there were a number of issues requiring trial: 1) whether the property was in compliance with all laws at the time it was sold (as required by the terms of the Agreement of Purchase and Sale); 2) the state of the Defendants' knowledge about the USTs and any leaks; 3) the strict liability regime imposed by Section 99 of the Environmental Protection Act; and, 4) the effect of spoliation of evidence, given that the Defendants had destroyed… [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:23 am
The REIT was formed on January 22, 2013 and is based in the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:22 pm
Sampson Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
In Frank v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:44 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:44 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:07 am
§ 271(f)(1), exposing the manufacturer to liability for all worldwide sales. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 11:22 am
Mikel, et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:59 pm
" The court then ruled that "all proceeds" traceable drug trafficking are subject to forfeiture, even if they are increased due to a windfall.The People of the State of Illinois v. $35,315 United States Currency, 2016 IL App (4th) 150685. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 4:03 am
The Clorox Company v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
As the promissory notes did not meet either the risk-capital or the Howey test for a security, the trial court properly set aside two criminal charges that the defendant used false statements in the sale of a security (People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 11:16 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Dec. 22, 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit applied the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 4:36 am
From here, one must also look at Rubin v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 3:50 pm
In Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado v. [read post]
