Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp" Results 2741 - 2760 of 4,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 5:42 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R. v SVS Solicitors [2012] EWCA Crim 319 (15 February 2012) A v B & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 285 (14 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Maqsood v Mahmood & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 251 (13 March 2012) JD (Congo) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 327 (16 March 2012) Barr & Ors v Biffa Waste Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 312 (19 March 2012) High Court… [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:16 am
Judge Birss QC assures us that his decision in Merck Sharp Dohme Corp & Anor v Teva Pharma BV & Anor [2012] EWHC 627 (Pat), relating to an application by Bristol-Myers Squibb for an interim injunction pending trial, raises no issue of principle, but he does provide an enlightening discussion of how to address some issues of fact that are common in an application for a quia timet injunction, including a review of the European case law. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On Monday 12 March 2012 Sharp J gave a brief judgment in the case of British Pregnancy Advisory Service v The person using the alias “Pablo Escobar” – the case relating to the hacking of the claimant’s website ([2012] EWHC 572 (QB)). [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:01 am by Dale Carpenter
Along the way, he offers sharp insights into the politics, ironies, and strategies behind the Brown v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by Ken Kersch
It entails a rather sharp break or rupture in time, the shift to a new regime, in a political sense. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:12 am by Chester Brown
The outcome in the Nuclear Tests cases offers a sharp reminder of this. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 12:20 am by Rosalind English
Tony Nicklinson v Ministry of Justice [2012] EWHC 304 (QB) – read judgment Jean-Dominique Bauby’s eyelid-blinking account of Locked-in Syndrome had us all quivering at the thought of being blindsided, as he was, at the peak of his career, on some banal afternoon outing. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by INFORRM
PCC staff are available at all times to advise members of the public further, and to offer practical, immediate assistance.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1,… [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 10:28 pm
" The judicial power grab of Marbury v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:06 pm by Tom Lamb
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., ATL-L-3394-11 (MT), which is currently ongoing in a New Jersey state court, with Judge Carol Higbee presiding -- that the osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) which Mrs. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:08 pm by Darren O'Donovan
In the main case in the area, Hungary v Slovakia, an agreement to build a dam agreed between the two countries made during the terms of Cold War era governments was held to still bind their democratic, successor governments. [read post]