Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 2741 - 2760 of 4,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Court Rules That State Bar’s Professional Liability Fund Is NOT Subject to MMSEA Reporting Mark Popolizio, of the Crowe Paradis Services Corp. explains the case of Oregon State Bar Professional Liability Fund v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am by Blog  Editorial
In the Court of Appeal Lord Neuberger MR delivered the sole judgment. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:57 am by Dwight Sullivan
  The current structure of four appellate defense divisions, four appellate government divisions, and four courts of criminal appeals may prove unsustainable both as a fiscal matter and as a practical matter. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:52 am by Susan Brenner
In New York, the Appellate Division held that, `[b]ank records . . . belong to the bank. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:44 am by Jasmine Joseph
Shambhu Nath Mukherjee AIR 1985 SC 141)Lately Supreme Court in the case of Ramrameshwari Devi v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
State Election Commission [AIR 1997 P&H 164], in which the High Court was considering a similar question as to whether the Election Tribunal constituted under the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, had the power to pass an injunction so as to restrain an elected representative from assuming office pending adjudication of an election petition filed against him. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
I have got what I wanted because the judge has said the size and shape of a newspaper, or what it is made of, is not the mark of whether it is a newspaper or not,” he said, outside court. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:04 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Super. 359, 376, 508 A.2d 298, 307 (1986), appeal denied, 514 Pa. 617, 521 A.2d 932 (1987); Delahanty v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible inference, the complaint states a legally cognizable cause of action sounding in legal malpractice (see Guayara v Harry I. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 pm by Larkin Reynolds
Tomorrow morning, a panel of three judges from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Chief Judge Sentelle along with Circuit Judges Ginsburg and Kavanaugh) will hear argument in the case of Salim Hamdan v. [read post]