Search for: "State v. D. H."
Results 2741 - 2760
of 3,858
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:46 am
Especially when you can come up with one like this for the case of Washington v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Sobel v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:23 pm
Code § 1301:6-3-01(L) exempts from the definition of the term “investment adviser” any person who “during the course of the preceding twelve months: (a) [h]as had fewer than fifteen clients; (b) [d]oes not hold himself out generally to the public as an investment adviser; and (c) [h]as clients consisting solely of… “[a]ccredited investors” as defined in… Regulation D…”… [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 8:10 am
-Angela D. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:00 pm
That rule states, in pertinent part: (h) Attorney Fees Awards. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(See Melone v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:54 am
’” In re Jobes, 108 N.J. 394, 407-08 (1987) (alteration in original) (quoting State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
" The definitions of information, public authority, record and right to information in clauses (f), (h), (i) and (j) of section 2 of the RTI Act are extracted below: "(f) "information" means any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body… [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:02 am
And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
Healthcare and Federalism: Should courts strictly scrutinize federal regulation of medical services?
14 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
But I'd argue that the feds need only do what private insurers do: Price the liability through higher premiums. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Gaughan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
H. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm
Gibbons Addison, Note, A proposed wealth distribution system based on the underlying premise of revenue sharing in American pro sports, 89 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 1179 (2011) Vikram David Amar, The NCAA as regulator, litigant, and state actor, 52 BOSTON COLLEGE LAW REVIEW 415 (2011) Andrew D. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:02 am
See Ugas v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
Ohlbaum.Ohlbaum, Edward D. [read post]
