Search for: "State v. D. M. B." Results 2741 - 2760 of 3,627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 3:17 am
Another factor in the litigation: The State Comptroller had issued an opinion indicating that Section 384-d(m) requires any Town police officer who ever enrolled in the 20-year plan to separate from service at age 55, regardless of whether the officer has subsequently withdrawn from the plan. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm by Bexis
Tex. 1997), aff’d in pertinent part, 165 F.3d 374, 379 n.4 (5th Cir. 1999); Spychala v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm by Maria Roche
At first instance, Mr Justice Collins dismissed TTM’s claim holding that his detention had not been unlawful until such time as the court declared the decision-making process to have been defective – applying R v Managers of South Western Hospital ex p M [1993] QB 683 and R v Central London County Court ex p London [1999] QB 1260 and distinguishing Re S-C (Mental Patient Habeas Corpus) [1996] QB 599 as it was not directly concerned with that question. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:48 pm by Mark Bennett
  Specifically, the Council recommended a “No” Vote by 86% margins on Propositions A, B, D, and E. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 am by Steve Lombardi
While this may be just a J-O-B to you, we aren't S-T-U-P-I-D. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:11 am by The Legal Blog
Justice BegThe Supreme Court in its landmark judgment, in M/s Mechalec Engineers and Manufactures v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
The investor-state dispute settlement mechanism has been the subject of criticism in the United States, Canada and Mexico. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
App. 1993); 4 [Harper], §§ 25.8, at 553; [2 Stuart M. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:40 am
Viacom states that this method of business only grew after YouTube was bought by Google for $1.65 billion in late 2006.The Section 512(1)(c)(A) issues: Surely YouTube knew what was going on! [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 10:39 am
Now for something serious and not so serious at times - the ABCs of HST: A is for Almost Everything - HST covers almost everything; B is for Bookkeeping - Registrants need to keep detailed records and maintain books are records that can be audited by the Canada Revenue Agency Auditors; C is for Canada Revenue Agency - The CRA enforces the HST (both the GST and PVAT portions); D is for Documentary Requirements - A top 10 audit issue is that registrations do not maintain adequate… [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
(Reexamination Alert) District Court M D Tennessee: Defendants’ allegation of fraud is one reason to deny motion to stay pending re-examination: Protective Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:00 am by Kara OBrien
UK branches of firms whose home state is within the EEA are not required to apply the Code as their home state will be required to apply equivalent provisions under CRD3. [read post]