Search for: "State v. Davi"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 5,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
Estate of Davis, South Florida Injury Lawyer Blawg, June 18, 2015 Right to Privacy in Florida Injury Case – Muller v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:55 pm
In addition to LifeLock, the FTC complaint named co-founders Richard Todd Davis and Robert Maynard, Jr., who will be barred from making the same misrepresentations as LifeLock. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:30 am
United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 11:50 am
The case is Michael Grecco Productions Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
The Supreme Court has wrestled with the concept of how much partisanship is too much since first finding partisan-gerrymandering claims justiciable in Davis v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm
State-law design-defect claims based on the adequacy of a drug’s warnings are preempted by federal law under a 2011 Supreme Court decision, PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
Addressing Berry's reliance on the United States Supreme Court's recent grant of certiorari in Baze v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
Field v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:56 am
See People v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:15 am
SANDS v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:50 pm
Case Name: KELVIN BOURKE v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 9:29 am
STATE OF WYOMING ex rel. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
THE STATE OF WYOMING and MATTHEW H. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:30 pm
”For the decision:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-appeals-court-rulingFor more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states Contact: AaronMackeyStaff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
16 May 2013, 11:08 am
To prevent people from being held in indefinite limbo, the Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:15 am
Affirmed.Case Name: CARLOS YAMMON PENA v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
This is the lowest level of support since 1972, the year the Supreme Court voided all existing state death penalty laws in Furman v. [read post]
