Search for: "State v. Franks"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 4,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Nevertheless, the Policy Statement will be published in the Federal Register, and comments may be submitted until July 3, 2023.[5] BACKGROUND The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)[6] makes it unlawful for any covered person or service provider to engage in any unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice.[7] The Dodd-Frank Act also provides the CFPB with rulemaking authority to define and prevent unfair,… [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am
United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:46 pm
Earlier this fall, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral argument in Tanner v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:44 am
Last year, I wrote about the Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
LEXIS 27198In the Gilligan case the major issues involved allegations by a former employee of the Town of Moreau (a) that she was dismissed from her position with the Town in retaliation for her testifying before a grand jury and (b) that she had been defamed by Town officials.Among the events that resulted in this litigation was a New York State Police investigation of the activities of the Town Supervisor, Michael Sullivan, and Frank Burt, a contractor hired to haul sand to the… [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
Supreme Court’s June 29, 2020 decision in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:00 am
So the researchers hypothesized that these awake ripple states are required for memory-guided decision-making. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
” [via LexisOne] FAVORABLE TO THE PROSECUTION OR EXECUTIONER United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 10:00 am
Frank Lanterman Developmental Services , 2024 Cal. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
On that basis, Mr Hardy's state of mind at the time of sending the email amounted to "reckless indifference to the illegality of his act" (Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 ). [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
On that basis, Mr Hardy's state of mind at the time of sending the email amounted to "reckless indifference to the illegality of his act" (Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 ). [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:58 am
The Court reviewed the district court decision letter and noted their reliance on Franks v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:47 am
(quoting Frank, 951 F.2d at 322). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:53 pm
In Business Roundtable v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 6:06 am
Eisenhower's nefarious plan to enforce Brown v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:20 am
The justices are scheduled to hear oral argument in Liu’s case on March 3, 2020 (Liu v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:52 pm
Supreme Court ruling issued in January -- Hurst v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 7:50 am
Both states are famous for their bucolic wilderness. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:18 am
Dept of State Police v. [read post]
