Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 19,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Luxembourg. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Patents In Nokia v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:50 am
In Merck & Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 9:34 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:04 am
Morinaga & Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:51 am
See State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 10:14 am
United States? [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 3:29 am
Distributing Company, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:00 pm
Such disputes arose in the case of Sköld v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Rule, Preserving Sacred Sites and Property Law, (August 7, 2023).Mark Satta, Commercial Discrimination as Religious Messaging in 303 Creative v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
This morning the CJEU (second chamber) handed down judgement in case C-98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA,Manufacture des Montres Rolex SAThe point at issue before the CJEU (set out in a series of questions which the court condensed to a single answer) was that, in the scenario where somebody purchased from a non-EU website counterfeit goods (in this case, a fake Rolex), could these be seized by customs, it being apparently common ground that the Customs Regulation required… [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:02 pm
New York State Dept. of Economic Development v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:15 am
This week on Capitol Hill and vicinity, the Supreme Court issues its decision in Iancu v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
LLC v New York State Dept. of Health, 222 AD3d 1083, 1085 [3d Dept 2023]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
LLC v New York State Dept. of Health, 222 AD3d 1083, 1085 [3d Dept 2023]). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:30 pm
Kraft Group LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
Tata Sons Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
"(4) A trade mark shall not be registered if, or to the extent that, its use in the United Kingdom is liable to be prevented— (a) by virtue of any rule of law (in particular, the law of passing off) protecting an unregistered trade mark or other sign used in the course of trade, or … A person thus entitled to prevent the use of a trade mark is referred to in this Act as the proprietor of an 'earlier right' in relation to the trade mark.… [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
