Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 11,764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2009, 7:00 am
[National Law Journal] * But Sonia Sotomayor saved baseball! [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:19 am
White v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
” Palmer v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 7:22 am
A majority of the court could use Kisor as an opportunity to reaffirm the constitutionality of the administrative state and save addressing concerns about Auer-inspired administrative abuse for cases in which those problems are actually presented. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:02 pm
In Van Horn v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:51 am
The Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:08 am
The Court held that the question of establishing a compensation scheme and the limits of such a scheme were matters for Government, reporting to Parliament and were not reviewable in the courts save on conventional irrationality grounds. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:47 pm
Lindstrom is the solicitor general of Michigan, which filed an amicus brief with 19 other states in support of Mark Janus in Janus v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
Case citation: Congoo, LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 7:21 am
But, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recently reversed (Ladd v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 11:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 7:19 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Georgia v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 9:20 am
All rise for the CC...Justice Brandeis’s concurrence in Ashwander v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 5:01 am
Now comes along another case in which failure to put something into writing has cost the taxpayer a deduction.In Martin v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:16 am
These exceptions will not save the case, the Court of Appeals says. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be assigned… [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:59 am
The recent case of Royal Caribbean v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be assigned… [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm
NexPoint seeks injunctions requiring the defendants to count votes cast for nominees put forward by NexPoint and to issue additional proxy materials retracting misleading statements and making accurate disclosures (NexPoint Advisors, L.P. v. [read post]
