Search for: "Supreme Court of New Mexico" Results 2741 - 2760 of 4,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 8:02 am by South Florida Lawyers
  In other news, can you believe an undocumented immigrant actually wants to practice law in Florida? [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 9:56 am by Steve Hall
Since executions resumed in 1976 after being halted by the Supreme Court, there have been 1,060 in the South, 150 in the Midwest, 75 in the West and 4 in the Northeast. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 8:48 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Protecting privacy: Beyond the ConstitutionMost legal privacy protections in federal law arise from statutes, not Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, and scholar Erin Murphy has helpfully compiled and analyzed those statutory provisions, noting that "at least four Supreme Court justices recently suggested in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:09 am by Charles Johnson
Scarpelli (411 U.S. 778), the Supreme Court decided that where “liberty interests” are involved, probationers are entitled to retain certain due process rights. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm
  In Kiobel, the Supreme Court could hold that the ATS has no extraterritorial application, it could severely limit its application, or it could maintain the status quo. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 12:19 pm by Bill Raftery
New MexicoSupreme Court, Court of Appeals, District Court, Metropolitan Court: SB 24, which was approved by the Senate but not the House, would have created a special fund to help pay for the judicial nominating commissions associated with the state’s merit selection system. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 2:52 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Part III examines the New Mexico Court of Appeals’ and the New Mexico Supreme Court’s opinions in Kilgore, focusing on the Supreme Court’s disavowal of any further reference to the presumption of prejudice in cases involving extraneous juror information. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:53 am by Steve Hall
In the past five years, four other states have abolished the death penalty - New Mexico, Illinois, New Jersey and New York. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:26 am by Lovechilde
Connecticut is on the verge of becoming the fifth state in five years to replace the death penalty (following Illinois, New Jersey, New Mexico and New York). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:26 am by Janai S. Nelson
   Just last year, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson (R) reflected that, “As governor of New Mexico, I was a bit naive and I did not think the government made mistakes with regard to the death penalty. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
See In re adoption of B.L.V.B., 160 Vt. 368 (Supreme Court of Vermont 1993); Adoption of Tammy, 619 N.E.2d 315 (Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts 1993); In re Adoption of a Child by J.M.G., 632 A.2d 550 (New Jersey Ch. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:03 am by Ediberto Roman
Supreme Court has found the Constitution requires all states to educate illegal immigrants through the 12th grade so Florida already has made a heavy investment in them. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
And on Monday, after meeting with the leaders of Canada and Mexico, President Obama warned the court would be overreaching if it does that. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
Willock, the New Mexico wedding photographer case that is still pending before the New Mexico Court of Appeals. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
However, the Court stated that it had no choice because only the New Mexico Supreme Court can write or rewrite rules of court procedure. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
My focus at the New York City Bar Association in January was on how careful comparisons between reformed military commissions and the federal courts can help highlight the two systems’ similarities, expose the systems’ differences to be consistent with the rule of law, and debunk the myth of military commissions as unsettled and unfair. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:16 am by Glenn Reynolds
Because if he wins, this kind of threat will simply allow people on the right to argue that the Supreme Court’s decision was the result of intimidation, and deserves no deference by a new Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:29 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) In a press conference today with the President of Mexico and the Prime Minister of Canada, President Obama was asked the following question by a reporter: After last week’s arguments at the Supreme Court, many experts believe that there could be a majority, a five-member majority, to strike down the individual mandate. [read post]