Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
It was at this point that Congress stepped in by passing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (the “TCPA”). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:31 pm
As reported on the Internet Cases blog and the Austin Technology Law blog, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal recently decided the case Vernor v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm
Search ads v. other online ads. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:46 am
The previous case, called Blue Shield of Virginia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:47 am
The previous case, called Blue Shield of Virginia v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/Qt0sI3N468 -> Canadian Government Assigns $142M in Funding for National Cybersecurity Programs http://t.co/QjSVog2K94 -> Google Wins Dismissal Of Privacy Policy Lawsuit – Data Protection http://t.co/ZlfkhjgnKO -> The definitive account of how hackers can gain access to our cars http://t.co/11qKHCM21c -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-07-23: Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-07-22 http://t.co/qiIh1… http://t.co/4WxtV0fgCV -> Computer and… [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
The alleged improper conduct (alleged in great detail), isn't linked up to these (or any) plaintiffs. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 1:02 pm
Television, radio and print media aren't dying, writes Paul R. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:58 pm
Department for Business, Energy and Industry Strategy v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:53 am
I immediately thought about breach of implied warranties of fitness for purpose which have been found to apply to software and which under various consumer protection laws cannot be disclaimed. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:48 am
The first sale doctrine is an essential protection of libraries’ right to lend our materials. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:54 pm
Shatto v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:37 am
Kee v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:22 pm
One mistake by the General Court isn’t enough to mean its whole decision is wrong (Merpel says “got it”).2. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
As Justice Scalia noted for the majority in AT&T v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:50 am
You have to protect your children from bad influences. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 9:12 pm
Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:40 pm
Right… perhaps the Internet’s Director of Operations can issue all companies and consumers one of those Staples “EASY” buttons for their desks, except this one would just say “ERASE” and magically clean up our online pasts! [read post]
