Search for: "TIME WARNER" Results 2741 - 2760 of 4,493
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2011, 9:07 am by Media Law Prof
The studio, Warner Brothers, now says it has plans to alter the tattoo if the case doesn't settle by the time the DVD hits stores at... [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:13 am by Lawrence Cunningham
But it takes a lot of time to incorporate them into a teaching program in a systemic way. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:16 pm by Site Administrator
Adelphia’s run of more than 50 years officially ended in 2006 when the remainder of its revenue-generating assets were purchased by Comcast and Time Warner. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm by Theo Francis
Today’s blog post on Time Warner Cable’s new fast-moving CFO is further down the page. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:22 am by Susan Brenner
He later “obtained [Sawyer’s] physical address” by issuing a subpoena to Time Warner Cable. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:03 am by Thomas P. Gulick
According to his complaint, Whitmill owns the rights to the image based on an agreement that was signed at the time Tyson obtained the tattoo. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:01 am by Theo Francis
It’s probably wise of Time Warner Cable to spread out those one-time grants. [read post]
27 May 2011, 12:25 pm by David Kravets
It’s not the first time a tattoo artist has wanted to cash in on infringement allegations. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:43 am by Christine Sellers
The New York Times also covered the allegations. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:57 am by Andrew Goldberg
“But at the same time, we understand and appreciate the judge’s concern for innocent third parties likely to be harmed by an injunction – like movie theaters – who shouldn’t be held responsible for Warner Bros. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:16 am by David Post
Courts have allowed copyright plaintiffs to use this injunction tactic (which gives the plaintiffs, of course, an enormous bargaining club of a value far in excess of the value of the copyright claim itself) much too frequently in the past (a point made many years ago, if memory serves, in a very influential law review article by our own Eugene Volokh); at the same time, the court noted that Whitmill “had a “strong likelihood of prevailing on the merits for copyright… [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:49 am by Scott Shaffer
" Because the tattoo is incorporated into Tyson's head, the copyright should not be allowed, argued Warner Bros. [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:45 pm by Gaetan Gerville-Reache
As a disclaimer, Warner, Norcross & Judd, LLP, represented the prevailing appellant, Sylvan Township. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:37 pm by David Kravets
It’s not the first time a tattoo artist has wanted to cash in on infringement allegations. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:09 am by Lara
On Saturday my friend, Duane Peterson, e-mailed me a link to a New York Times article about a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by Mike Tyson’s tattoo artist, S. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:13 pm
 The Wall Street Journal quotes several media executives, including at CBS and Time Warner, saying very positive things about Netflix. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:55 pm
Bottom line: of the five largest Internet providers in the country, the three cable companies (Comcast, Time Warner, Cox) employ shaping while the telephone companies (AT&T, Verizon) do not—though that fact is less significant for the user experience than it might first sound. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:11 am by Michelle Leder
But at the same time that others were kicking Warner’s tires, the company also made an offer — in December 2010 — to acquire one of its “major competitors”. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:29 am by jacquelyn.mccloud@law.csuohio.edu
Noam Cohen of The New York Times recently reported in "On Tyson's Face, It's Art. [read post]