Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 6,508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2016, 4:22 pm
A United States District Court recently issued a decision that denied a plaintiff’s request to impose sanctions against a defendant for destroying evidence before trial on the plaintiff’s pharmacy error claim. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:22 pm
A United States District Court recently issued a decision that denied a plaintiff’s request to impose sanctions against a defendant for destroying evidence before trial on the plaintiff’s pharmacy error claim. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 1:21 am
The two most important recent Florida state appellate decisions, both from 2009, are Mailloux v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am
In this regard, precedent from the United States Supreme Court, in Ruckelhaus v. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 3:00 pm
United States (06-11429), Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:56 am
United States, in which they will consider whether a co-conspirator can be held independently liable for forfeiture of the proceeds of a drug conspiracy. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 5:01 pm
Once again surprising the country by acting ten days before its own self-appointed deadline, a federal district judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a ruling today in the Ryan v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
The purchaser also signed an export policy imposing liquidated damages if Desert exported the new vehicle out of the United States within one year of purchase. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:42 am
A new decision from the United States District Court in Illinois, Miracle-Pond, et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
United States,540 U.S. 375, 381, 124 S. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:08 pm
United States. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:05 am
In Belya v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:53 am
For example, in McNamara v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 11:35 am
United States of America, U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 11:35 am
United States of America, U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:03 pm
In so concluding, the Court ruled that Blanton, the plaintiff employee of a Domino’s franchisee, had adequately pled that Domino’s used the franchise agreements to orchestrate a conspiracy among their franchisees to not compete for labor; Blanton says that the no-hire provision is evidence of that conspiracy and violates the Sherman Antitrust Act because it unreasonably restrains competition for Domino’s franchise employees and depresses employee wages, lessens employee benefits,… [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
In Williamson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 am
Proia, Freeing the Prop 8 Tape: Perry v. [read post]
