Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 51,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 4:36 am
While no recorded dissent or explanation was given by the Supreme Court, the 11th Circuit Court cited the Supreme Court opinion in Glossip v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:50 am
Musladin, 549 US 70 (2006). [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:18 pm
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Compulife Software, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:29 am
King, and R. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] 3 WLR 636 left us all wondering about the form and limits of a challenge to summary possession proceedings. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
The decision will be closely watched given the Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
Irby v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:05 pm
In France v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:00 am
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:29 pm
Much like Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
He was removed on January 30, 2014, and returned on March 7, 2014, bringing us back to this case, which arises out of Peralta’s arrest on March 8, 2014.FN - In sum, from what we can tell from the record, Peralta has at least eight felony arrests (1982, 1983, 1990, 1996, 2000, 2002 (2), and 2014) and five misdemeanor DUI convictions, and he has been removed from the United States at least four times (1999, 2001, 2004, and 2012). [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 12:07 pm
Given those facts, I think it was indeed error not to grant the defendant the ability to respond to that argument in a brief surrebuttal -- as precedent in fact requires. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:17 am
Case Citation: Campos v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 1:09 pm
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:02 pm
ACLU Foundation v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 6:55 am
Watson was one of those cases that you can pretty well tell what's going to happen from the oral argument - and the oral argument hadn't given those of us who live on the right side of the "v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am
Nevertheless it was reasoned that it would be lawful to detain a person for as long as necessary to complete a lawful process (Gahramanov v Azerbaijan (application No 26291/06) (unreported) given 15 October 2013) and on some occasions a person may need to be detained for longer than necessary to complete the lawful process. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 4:57 am
Water Conditioners, Inc. v. [read post]
