Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 13,833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 4:39 pm
Rosenthal of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
California (1931), Nebbia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Heasley).Non-ownership: Opposer claimed that the mark was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, a California corporation, and therefore that JY Insyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 2:44 pm
Robert Romero v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No: 20-cv-4419 Filed: May 15, 2020 […] [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
Texas and United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:25 am
South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
First, on May 26, the South Bay United Pentecostal Church in California filed an application for injunctive relief with Circuit Justice Kagan. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf wonders why the dissenters to the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In two companion cases, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided whether a federal district court could properly exercise jurisdiction over climate change suits brought against energy companies by cities and counties in California. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In two companion cases, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided whether a federal district court could properly exercise jurisdiction over climate change suits brought against energy companies by cities and counties in California. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:51 am
Sell v United States, a Supreme Court case, allowed states to medicate individuals too incompetent to stand trial. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 8:03 am
] Last weekend, the Supreme Court rejected a California church's application for a temporary injunction against enforcement of a state public-health order limiting attendance at houses of worship (South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
“Do you think the United States would allow Hawaii and California to declare independence? [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
At The National Law Review, Evan Seeman looks at the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
The certification also stated plaintiff “[understood] that [defendant] reserve[d] the right to null and void the auction and sale of the unit for any reason. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:51 am
” Recap of United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
