Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 4,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
In Holder v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:55 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:46 am
National Protest on DOMA—Michael Lehet (Flickr.com) When some constitutionally suspect classifications (race, religion, alienage, or national origin) are not at issue, nor are any fundamental constitutional rights at stake, a law must be upheld if there is any “reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification” (United States Railroad Retirement Bd. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:02 pm
Roberts, Jr.’s opinion for the Court in another 2010 decision, Holder v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:00 am
In Title 17 of the United States Code, Congress expressly conferred to copyright holders – composers, songwriters, lyricists, and publishers – the exclusive right to perform or authorize the performance of their works publicly. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:32 am
The title report revealed that co-defendant Maxcine Holder (“Holder”) owned the unit, rather than Kinder, and further revealed the existence of two outstanding mortgages; an outstanding judgment of foreclosure; a lien for unpaid common charges; tax liens; and a certificate of occupancy designating the unit as a doctor’s office (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “title defects” or “title issues”). [read post]
24 May 2012, 10:06 am
Gutierrez, consolidated with Holder v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:56 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit joined several other circuits in holding contrary to statute a Department of Justice (DOJ) regulation divesting the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of jurisdiction when an alien leaves the United States in Lin v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:21 pm
Holder (Circuit docket 11-5256). [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:09 am
In Holder v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:16 am
Gutsier, No. 10-1542, and Holder v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:28 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:23 am
In any event, even if Bahlul had been convicted on the basis of the video alone, that would not violate the First Amendment given that: (1) Supreme Court precedent makes it clear that the First Amendment does not protect such acts when committed overseas by enemy aliens engaged in warfare against the United States; (2) the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Holder v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:07 am
SOURCE: United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:00 pm
& Murphy v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:10 am
Georgia State University Logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)In what may be a precedent-setting 350-page ruling in Cambridge University Press et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:21 am
This is a considerable shift from present practices of the United States. [read post]
